Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleFocus
Revenue and market share can obscure substantial differences in returns across activities, customer groups and positions in the value chain.
A positioning strategy becomes meaningful only when the answer changes customer preference under realistic competitive conditions.
Strategic challenges
Pricing, channels, delivery and cost structure can each appear rational while producing unattractive economics when combined.
The harder problem is concentrating enough talent and capital behind a limited number of opportunities to generate meaningful evidence.
POV
A large pipeline of experiments is not evidence of innovation strength when the organisation cannot explain which future advantages it is trying to build.
A company can gain share and still lose economically when rivalry forces pricing, investment or service levels beyond sustainable returns.
Strategic impact
Demanding conventional certainty too early can eliminate important options before the technical and commercial questions are answerable.
Revenue can expand while promotions, acquisition spending and channel costs quietly reduce the value created by each additional customer.
What we observe
We frequently see new priorities added without removing initiatives whose original rationale has weakened or disappeared.
We frequently see outlet counts and geographic coverage expand while revenue density, margin quality and partner economics deteriorate.