When strategic recovery requires more than cost cutting
How turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleHow leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleFocus
Early R&D should create knowledge that changes future choices, not simply advance projects because resources have already been committed.
The most useful venture plan identifies the small number of assumptions whose failure would make the opportunity economically or strategically unattractive.
Strategic challenges
The harder problem is concentrating enough talent and capital behind a limited number of opportunities to generate meaningful evidence.
Technology, convergence and new business models increasingly allow competitors from adjacent sectors to enter established value pools.
POV
Strong execution cannot preserve advantage indefinitely when the underlying structure determining value capture is moving elsewhere.
Building what customers ask for can improve a product while gradually destroying the differentiation that gave them a reason to choose it.
Strategic impact
A growth product, retention product and harvesting product should not receive resources according to the same assumptions or success criteria.
Staged validation makes it possible to expand commitment only after the assumptions carrying the greatest risk have been tested.
What we observe
We frequently see strategic importance assigned according to revenue while complexity, concessions and servicing requirements quietly erode value.
We frequently see new businesses constrained by processes, economics and incentives designed for an established operation rather than a venture.