From AI pilots to enterprise performance
What separates companies that scale AI from those that accumulate experiments�and how operating models, economics and governance determine whether adoption creates measurable value.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
What separates companies that scale AI from those that accumulate experiments�and how operating models, economics and governance determine whether adoption creates measurable value.
Read articleHow leaders can recover stalled programs by simplifying the enterprise, reprioritizing economics and scaling only what delivers measurable value.
Read articleFocus
Manufacturers are combining automation, physical AI and connected operations as productivity and resilience pressures intensify.
Conflict, chokepoints, sanctions and strategic stockpiling are increasing the value of optionality across energy and resource markets.
Strategic challenges
The challenge is balancing efficiency with alternative routes and capacity when geopolitical disruption can quickly rewrite transit economics.
The challenge is balancing deployment, exits and investor distributions when traditional realization routes remain uneven.
POV
Connectivity may look strategically unexciting, but moving into lower-margin technology services is not automatically a better business.
The harder question is whether geopolitics is temporarily repricing supply or permanently rewriting how resources reach markets.
Strategic impact
As easy repricing fades, value creation depends increasingly on occupancy, service, asset productivity and sector-specific operating expertise.
Persistent overcapacity is forcing sharper choices across assets, geographies and product chains rather than reliance on cyclical recovery.
What we observe
Technology adds limited capacity when administrative burden, fragmented pathways and role boundaries remain structurally unchanged.
New supply creates limited value when transmission constraints, interconnection delays and inflexible demand prevent electricity from reaching users.