The strategic cost of dependency
Why concentrated exposure to critical technologies, materials and infrastructure is becoming a board-level issue across industries.
Read article
2 min read
Author: KeynesMoore
Compete on policy-adjusted economics
Industrial policy has become a material input to competitive advantage. OECD analysis places industrial subsidies at about $108 billion in 2024 across 15 key sectors, with support concentrated in semiconductors, clean energy, metals and other strategic industries. Grants are only one mechanism: tax credits, concessional finance, public procurement, local-content rules and infrastructure can all change a project's effective cost curve.
Headline incentives are an unreliable basis for investment. Their value depends on eligibility, timing, taxable income, performance conditions and the durability of the policy. They may also carry constraints on sourcing, employment, technology transfer or future distributions. A location with the largest announced package can have weaker economics once compliance costs and policy risk are included.
Management should build a policy-adjusted profit pool by market and competitor. This model estimates how public support changes capital intensity, marginal cost, demand formation and speed to scale. It should include indirect effects: subsidized upstream capacity may reduce input prices, while supported rivals can sustain pricing that would be uneconomic without state backing.
The investment process needs explicit guardrails. Separate the return of the underlying asset from the return created by incentives; stress-test delays, clawbacks and a change of government; assign accountability for each condition. Where possible, stage commitments and design facilities that can serve more than one product or market if policy assumptions fail.
Industrial policy can create genuine opportunities, but it should not replace strategy. Durable advantage still rests on capabilities, customers and productivity. The strongest firms use public support to accelerate an already coherent position, monitor rivals on comparable economics and retain the option to compete after exceptional assistance declines.
Related macro
Geopolitics
Assess geopolitical shifts, exposure and scenarios to inform strategy, investment, operations and market decisions.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Geopolitics moves from risk register to operating model
How trade restrictions, bloc realignment and political volatility are reshaping sourcing, technology access and global footprint decisions.
Read articleFocus
Bloc realignment is changing the geography of supply, investment and market access
Friend-shoring and nearshoring can alter cost structures, supplier networks and the strategic logic of international footprints.
Geoeconomic pressure is turning trade flows into instruments of state power
Tariffs, controls, subsidies and market restrictions increasingly shape where companies can sell, source and invest.
Strategic challenges
Where would an energy or materials shock hit the business first?
The challenge is tracing direct and indirect exposure across inputs, suppliers, logistics, pricing and customer demand.
Which technology dependencies could become geopolitical constraints?
The challenge is identifying where regulation, national security policy or sovereign priorities can disrupt critical technology access.
POV
More geopolitical information does not create better geopolitical judgment
The enterprise needs fewer, better-defined signals tied to exposure and decisions, not a constant stream of global developments.
Knowing that a conflict is worsening is not the same as knowing what to do
Enterprise relevance begins only when geopolitical developments are translated into specific exposures and decision triggers.
Strategic impact
Dependency analysis shows where external control can constrain strategic options
Mapping critical inputs and ownership structures helps management assess substitution, concentration and sovereignty risk.
Shock analysis reveals where resource exposure can alter operating economics
Connecting geopolitical events with critical inputs helps management assess cost, continuity and substitution implications.
What we observe
Organizations often discuss geopolitical shocks without quantifying business impact
Scenario narratives remain abstract when they are not connected to revenue, assets, suppliers, costs or decision thresholds.
Companies often treat industrial policy as upside without testing dependency
Subsidies can improve economics while tying investments to political conditions, localization rules or future policy uncertainty.